THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO VARIATION OF MAINTENANCE ORDER CASE LAW

The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

Blog Article

77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his above mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

3.  I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have absent through the record of this case with their in a position assistance.

Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity in the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is inside the obvious negation of your regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its several pronouncements. Read more

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that when contemplating the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to look at the merit of many of the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who will be found to generally be most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded via the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part of your respondent department.

The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders preserving in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel for that respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more

9.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is place in its place.

Consequently, it was held that the right to the healthy environment was part on the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and fourteen on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all aspects of human existence, all this kind of amenities and services that a person is entitled to get pleasure from with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same form of case.

share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property may also sold to check here another co-owner/co-sharer or maybe to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and regarded researchers to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.

Report this page